Patient Body Parameters Live
Calculates Total Blood Volume (TBV), Total Plasma Volume (TPV), and Red Cell Volume (RCV) — the foundational values required for all other apheresis calculations. Results from this module carry forward to other calculators.
📖 Nadler et al., Surgery 1962 · Lemmens et al., Obes Surg 2006Nadler's Formula for Total Blood Volume (TBV)
Females: TBV (L) = (0.3561 × H³) + (0.03308 × W) + 0.1833
TBV (mL) = 65 mL/kg × Weight (kg) [Females]
H = Height in meters · W = Weight in kg · Nadler's formula is the standard used by most apheresis devices (Spectra Optia®, Haemonetics MCS+)
📊 Patient Parameters
Reference: Normal Values by Body Size
| Parameter | Average Adult Male | Average Adult Female | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| TBV | 5,000–6,000 mL | 4,000–5,000 mL | Basis for all apheresis volume calculations |
| TPV | 2,700–3,200 mL | 2,300–2,800 mL | Determines TPE prescription volume |
| RCV | 2,200–2,800 mL | 1,600–2,200 mL | Determines RBC exchange donor volume |
| Hematocrit | 40–52% | 36–48% | Key variable; changes during procedure |
Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) Live
Calculates plasma volume to process, replacement fluid volumes, and estimated solute reduction for each TPE session. ASFA recommends 1.0–1.5× plasma volumes per session for most indications.
📖 ASFA 9th Edition (2023) · Cervantes et al., AJKD 2023 · Reverberi, Blood Transfus 2007TPE Volume & Solute Removal Formulas
Residual Fraction = e^(−TPE Volume / TPV)
% Removed = (1 − Residual Fraction) × 100
Where TPV = Total Plasma Volume (from Patient Parameters). Assumes single-compartment model, intravascular distribution, and isovolumetric exchange. Valid for IgG, IgM, fibrinogen, and other high-MW substances.
Auto-fill from Patient Parameters: If you have already calculated Patient Body Parameters, the TPV field below will be pre-filled. Otherwise, enter the TPV manually.
📊 TPE Prescription
ASFA Replacement Fluid Guidelines
| Replacement Fluid | Standard Use | Preferred When | Avoid When |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5% Albumin | First-line for most indications | Routine TPE, maintenance sessions | Active bleeding, coagulopathy, TTP (use FFP) |
| Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) | TTP (mandatory), anti-GBM, HUS | Coagulopathy, factor replacement needed | Routine use (risk of allergic reactions, TRALI) |
| 50% Albumin / 50% FFP | Compromise approach | Mild coagulopathy, last few sessions | Active TTP (use 100% FFP) |
| Normal Saline | Partial replacement only | Mild hyperviscosity, volume management | Full-volume replacement (hypoproteinemia risk) |
Solute Removal Kinetics
Models the exponential removal of intravascular substances during TPE using the Wiener-Wexler one-compartment model. Useful for understanding how many sessions are needed to achieve target reduction levels.
📖 Reverberi & Reverberi, Blood Transfus 2007 · Wiener & Wexler 1946One-Compartment Removal Model
Where: v = volume exchanged (mL) · V = plasma volume (mL)
e = Euler's number (2.71828...)
Valid for high-molecular-weight substances (IgG, IgM, fibrinogen, LDL) that are predominantly intravascular. Underestimates removal for small, diffusible molecules (bilirubin, ammonia).
📊 Predicted Removal by Session
| Session | Volume Exchanged | Residual (%) | Estimated Level | % Removed (Cumulative) |
|---|
RBC Exchange (RBCX) — Sickle Cell Disease Live
Calculates the Fraction of Cells Remaining (FCR) and the volume of donor pRBCs required to achieve a target post-procedure HbS% in automated red cell exchange (erythrocytapheresis). Supports Exchange Only and Depletion/Exchange protocols with FCR-from-HbS% conversion and Nadler's TBV formula.
📖 Nadler et al., Surgery 1962 · Fasano et al., Transfusion 2015 · ASFA 9th Ed. Category I, Grade 1C · Spectra Optia default: Inlet:AC ratio 13:1FCR ≠ HbS% — Understanding the Difference
FCR (Fraction of Cells Remaining) is the percentage of the patient's original RBC volume remaining after the procedure. HbS% is the percentage of sickled hemoglobin in the blood. FCR = HbS% only if the patient's starting HbS is 100% (i.e., no prior transfusions). For transfused patients, always calculate FCR from HbS% using the formula below. The Spectra Optia accepts either FCR directly or calculates it from starting/target HbS%.
Exchange Only: Patient RBCs replaced directly with donor RBCs. Most common protocol. | Depletion/Exchange: First depletes patient RBCs with non-cellular fluid (lowers Hct), then exchanges with donor RBCs. Requires fewer donor units for same FCR. Recommended when pre-procedure Hct ≥26%.
Core Formulas — Automated RBC Exchange (Erythrocytapheresis)
RCV: RCV (mL) = TBV × (Pre-Hct ÷ 100)
Exchange Only — Donor Volume:
Vdonor = TBV × [(Target Hct − Pre-Hct × FCR) ÷ Donor Hct] (all Hct as decimals)
Depletion/Exchange — Donor Volume:
Phase 1 (Depletion): Lower Hct to Depletion Target Hct using saline/albumin
Phase 2 (Exchange): Vdonor = TBV × [(Target Hct − Depletion Hct × FCR) ÷ Donor Hct]
Units Needed: N = Vdonor ÷ Unit Volume (mL)
Spectra Optia defaults: Inlet:AC ratio 13:1 · AC infusion rate 0.8 mL/min · 100% fluid balance. TBV calculated by Nadler's formula from Patient Parameters module.
📊 RBCX Prescription — Spectra Optia Parameters
Clinical Targets by Indication
| Indication | Target Post-HbS | Target Post-Hct | Protocol Preference | ASFA Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute Stroke / TIA | <30% | 30–36% | Exchange Only | Cat I, Grade 1C |
| Stroke Prevention (Chronic) | <30% | 30–36% | Exchange or Dep/Exch | Cat I, Grade 1B |
| Acute Chest Syndrome (Severe) | <30% | 30–36% | Exchange Only | Cat II, Grade 2C |
| Pre-operative Preparation | <30–50% | 30–36% | Exchange or Dep/Exch | Cat II, Grade 2C |
| Priapism / Pain Crisis | <30–50% | 30–36% | Exchange Only | Cat III, Grade 2C |
Leukocytapheresis — Hyperleukocytosis
Estimates post-procedure WBC count and the number of sessions needed to achieve a target WBC level in hyperleukocytosis. A single session typically reduces WBC by 30–60%.
📖 Zhang et al., Int J Gen Med 2021 · ASFA 9th Edition · Kanungo et al., AJTS 2025WBC Reduction Formula
% Reduction = (Pre-WBC − Post-WBC) / Pre-WBC × 100
Sessions Needed = log(Target WBC / Pre-WBC) / log(1 − Reduction Rate)
Single leukapheresis reduces WBC by 30–60% (ASFA 9th Ed.). Reduction rate varies by device, blood volume processed, and WBC differential. AML blasts are removed less efficiently than lymphocytes.
Emergency Threshold: Leukapheresis is typically indicated when WBC >100×10⁹/L (hyperleukocytosis) with symptomatic leukostasis (respiratory failure, neurological changes). In AML, consider at WBC >50×10⁹/L with symptoms. Leukapheresis is a temporizing measure — cytoreductive chemotherapy must follow.
📊 Leukocytapheresis Estimates
HPC Stem Cell Collection (Leukapheresis)
Predicts CD34+ cell yield from peripheral blood leukapheresis for hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) collection. Used to plan collection sessions and determine if target dose will be achieved.
📖 Sheppard et al., BBMT 2016 · Jacob et al., Transfusion 2021 · AABB Vol 3 Cellular Therapy (2025, catalog reference only)CD34+ Yield Prediction Formula
CE₂ = Collected CD34+ cells / (PB CD34+ × Total WB Volume Processed)
Target Dose: ≥2×10⁶ CD34+/kg (minimum) · ≥4×10⁶ CD34+/kg (optimal)
PB CD34+ = Peripheral blood CD34+ count on day of collection. CE₂ = Collection Efficiency formula 2 (typically 30–50% for most devices). Blood volume processed = typically 3–5× TBV.
📊 HPC Collection Prediction
CD34+ Mobilization Adequacy Thresholds
| PB CD34+ Count | Mobilization Status | Expected Yield | Clinical Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| <5 cells/µL | Poor mobilization | Unlikely to meet minimum dose | Consider plerixafor rescue, delay collection |
| 5–10 cells/µL | Marginal | May require multiple sessions | Proceed with caution; consider plerixafor |
| 10–20 cells/µL | Adequate | Likely to meet minimum (2×10⁶/kg) | Proceed with collection |
| >20 cells/µL | Good mobilization | Likely to meet optimal (4×10⁶/kg) | Proceed; single session may suffice |
Platelet Collection Efficiency (CE)
Calculates collection efficiency (CE1 and CE2) for plateletpheresis procedures and estimates the therapeutic dose. Used for donor qualification, device performance monitoring, and quality control.
📖 Jaime-Pérez et al., J Clin Apheresis 2017 · Castillo-Aleman et al., Transfusion & Apheresis Sci 2023Collection Efficiency Formulas
CE₂ (%) = (Collected Platelets) / (Pre-count × WB Volume Processed) × 100
Platelet Yield = Product Volume (mL) × Product PLT Count (×10⁹/mL)
Therapeutic Dose: ≥3.0×10¹¹ platelets per unit (AABB standard)
CE₁ uses TBV as denominator (theoretical maximum). CE₂ uses actual whole blood volume processed (more practical). Target CE₂ is typically ≥50% for most devices.
📊 Plateletpheresis Results
Citrate Toxicity Risk Assessment Live
Calculates citrate infusion rate and assesses toxicity risk based on blood flow rate, ACD-A ratio, and patient weight. Citrate chelates ionized calcium, causing hypocalcemia — the primary mechanism of citrate toxicity.
📖 Lee et al., Transfusion Med Rev 2012 · Weinstein et al., J Clin Apheresis 2023 · ASFA 9th EditionCitrate Infusion Rate Formula
Citrate Dose (mg/kg/min) = [ACD-A Rate × 20.6 mg/mL] ÷ [Patient Weight (kg)]
Max Safe Rate: <1.5 mg/kg/min (standard) · <1.8 mg/kg/min (absolute max)
ACD-A contains 20.6 mg/mL of citric acid equivalent. Standard Inlet:AC ratio is 1:12 to 1:16 depending on device and procedure. Lower ratio = more citrate = higher toxicity risk.
High-Risk Patients: Liver disease (impaired citrate metabolism), hypoalbuminemia, hypomagnesemia, alkalosis, pediatric patients, and patients on calcium channel blockers are at elevated risk for citrate toxicity at standard doses. Consider prophylactic calcium supplementation.
📊 Citrate Toxicity Assessment
Citrate Toxicity: Signs, Symptoms & Management
| Severity | Symptoms | iCa²⁺ Level | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | Perioral tingling, paresthesias, chills | 0.9–1.1 mmol/L | Slow blood flow rate, oral calcium carbonate |
| Moderate | Muscle cramps, nausea, anxiety, tremors | 0.7–0.9 mmol/L | Reduce flow rate, IV calcium gluconate 1–2 g |
| Severe | Tetany, carpopedal spasm, arrhythmia, hypotension | <0.7 mmol/L | Stop procedure, IV calcium gluconate 2–4 g, ECG monitoring |
LDL Apheresis Efficacy Live
Calculates acute LDL reduction per session, time-averaged LDL (using the Kroon formula), and estimated treatment frequency to achieve target LDL levels. Used for Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH/HeFH) management.
📖 Kayikcioglu et al., PMC 2021 · Reijman et al., ERKNet 2024 · Schumann et al., J Lipid Res 2024LDL Reduction & Kroon Formula
Kroon Time-Averaged LDL = LDL_post + K × (LDL_pre − LDL_post)
K = 0.73 (biweekly) · K = 0.63 (weekly) · K = 0.83 (monthly)
The Kroon formula accounts for the non-linear rebound of LDL between sessions. Time-averaged LDL is the clinically meaningful metric for cardiovascular risk reduction, not just the post-procedure nadir.
📊 LDL Apheresis Efficacy
LDL Apheresis Eligibility Criteria (FDA / EAS)
| Patient Type | LDL Threshold | Additional Criteria | ASFA Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| HoFH — No CVD | LDL ≥300 mg/dL | Max tolerated drug therapy | Cat I, Grade 1B |
| HoFH — With CVD | LDL ≥200 mg/dL | Max tolerated drug therapy | Cat I, Grade 1B |
| HeFH — With CVD | LDL ≥160 mg/dL | Failure of drug therapy | Cat II, Grade 1B |
| Elevated Lp(a) — With CVD | Lp(a) ≥60 mg/dL | Progressive CVD despite LDL control | Cat II, Grade 2C |
Replacement Fluid Calculator (TPE)
Calculates albumin and FFP volumes required for a TPE procedure, estimates coagulation factor depletion with albumin-only replacement, and determines FFP unit requirements based on the prescribed replacement fluid ratio.
📖 Cervantes et al., AJKD Core Curriculum 2023 · Zrimsek et al., J Clin Med 2024 · ASFA 9th EditionReplacement Fluid Formulas
Albumin Volume: Albumin (mL) = Total Vol × Albumin Fraction
FFP Volume: FFP (mL) = Total Vol × FFP Fraction
FFP Units: Units = FFP Volume ÷ 250 mL/unit
Coag Factor Residual (albumin-only): Residual% = e−(exchange vol / TPV) × 100
💧 Replacement Fluid Prescription
Replacement Fluid Selection by Indication
| Indication | Preferred Fluid | Rationale | ASFA Guidance |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTP (ADAMTS13 deficiency) | 100% FFP or cryopoor plasma | Replenishes ADAMTS13; cryopoor preferred to avoid VWF loading | Cat I, Grade 1A |
| HUS (Shiga toxin) | FFP or albumin | Less clear benefit; albumin acceptable if no coagulopathy | Cat III, Grade 2C |
| ANCA-AAV / Anti-GBM | 5% Albumin | No coagulation factor replacement needed | Cat I–II |
| Myasthenia Gravis / CIDP | 5% Albumin | Standard; FFP only if coagulopathy present | Cat I, Grade 1B |
| Coagulopathy / Pre-surgical | 50–100% FFP | Maintain coagulation factors ≥40% activity | Institutional protocol |
Immunoadsorption (IA) — IgG Removal
Calculates IgG removal per session and cumulative removal across multiple sessions using Protein A or other immunoadsorption columns. Estimates grams of IgG removed and predicts post-treatment IgG levels.
📖 Süfke et al., Ther Apher Dial 2017 · Giszas et al., Ther Apher Dial 2023 · Fuchs et al., PMC9291474 (2021)Immunoadsorption IgG Removal Formulas
Residual IgG after N sessions: IgGresidual = IgG0 × (1 − Removal Rate)N
Cumulative Removal %: Removal% = (1 − (1 − r)N) × 100
🔬 Immunoadsorption Results
Common IA Indications (ASFA Guidelines)
| Indication | Target Molecule | Column Type | ASFA Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myasthenia Gravis (severe) | Anti-AChR / Anti-MuSK IgG | Protein A or tryptophan | Cat I, Grade 1C |
| ANCA-AAV (refractory) | ANCA (IgG) | Protein A | Cat II, Grade 2C |
| Dilated Cardiomyopathy | Anti-β1-AR IgG | Protein A | Cat II, Grade 1B |
| Pemphigus Vulgaris | Anti-Dsg1/3 IgG | Protein A or IA | Cat II, Grade 1C |
| Hemophilia A (inhibitors) | Anti-FVIII IgG | Protein A | Cat II, Grade 2C |
Double Filtration Plasmapheresis (DFPP)
Calculates the sieving coefficient, removal ratio, and discard volume for DFPP procedures. DFPP uses a secondary plasma fractionator to selectively remove large-molecular-weight proteins (IgG, IgM, fibrinogen) while retaining albumin.
📖 Perondi et al., PMC5974530 (2018) · JCA Plasma Separation Efficiency 2026 · Indian J Nephrol DFPP StudyDFPP Sieving & Removal Formulas
Removal Ratio (RR): RR = 1 − (Cpost / Cpre)
Discard Volume: Vdiscard = Vplasma filtered × (1 − SCalbumin)
Albumin Loss: Loss = Plasma filtered × [Albumin] × (1 − SCalbumin)
🔁 DFPP Results
Sieving Coefficients by Filter Type
| Filter | IgG SC | IgM SC | Albumin SC | Fibrinogen SC | Primary Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaflux 4A | 0.40 | 0.05 | 0.85 | 0.20 | IgG removal (FH, FSGS) |
| Evaflux 2A | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.90 | 0.50 | IgM / large molecule removal |
| Cascadeflo EC-20W | 0.35 | 0.03 | 0.88 | 0.15 | Selective IgG (low albumin loss) |
Extracorporeal Volume (ECV) Safety Check Live
Calculates the extracorporeal volume as a percentage of the patient's total blood volume to determine whether circuit priming with pRBCs or albumin is required. Critical for pediatric patients and small adults where ECV >10–15% TBV can cause hemodynamic instability.
📖 Chuang et al., Pediatric TPE 2025 · PMC5269433 (Bojanic 2016) · ASFA 9th Edition · Taylan et al., PMC9039165 (2022)ECV Safety Formula
Safe threshold: ECV ≤10% TBV (preferred) · ≤15% TBV (maximum acceptable)
Pediatric TBV: Neonates 87.5 mL/kg · Infants 80 mL/kg · Children 72.5 mL/kg · Adolescents/Adults 65–70 mL/kg (Nadler formula preferred)
🛡️ ECV Safety Assessment
ECV Safety Thresholds & Prime Recommendations
| ECV % of TBV | Safety Status | Action |
|---|---|---|
| ≤10% | Safe | Proceed without priming |
| 10–15% | Caution | Consider priming; monitor closely for hemodynamic changes |
| >15% | Prime Required | Prime circuit with pRBCs (10–15 mL/kg) or 5% albumin before connecting patient |
Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP)
Calculates the Uvadex (8-MOP / methoxsalen) dose, buffy coat volume, MNC dose per kg, and patient eligibility for ECP procedures. Supports both inline (Therakos CELLEX) and offline (Spectra Optia cMNC) methods.
📖 Drugs.com Uvadex Dosage Guide · Mayer et al., J Clin Apher 2022 (PMC9542192) · Arora & Setia, Asian J Transfus Sci 2017 (PMC5613442) · ASFA 9th EditionECP Core Formulas
MNC Dose: MNC dose (×106/kg) = Total MNCs collected / Patient weight (kg)
Collection Efficiency (CE2): CE2 = (MNCproduct × Volproduct) / (MNCblood × Volprocessed) × 100%
Treatment Volume (offline): TV = Buffy coat volume + Saline diluent (e.g., 100 mL + 200 mL = 300 mL)
☀️ ECP Prescription Results
ECP Indications & ASFA Categories
| Indication | ASFA Category | Grade | Typical Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTCL (erythrodermic) | Cat I | Grade 1B | 2 consecutive days every 4 weeks |
| Chronic GVHD (steroid-refractory) | Cat I | Grade 1B | 2 days every 2–4 weeks |
| Acute GVHD (steroid-refractory) | Cat II | Grade 1C | 2 days weekly × 4–8 weeks |
| Cardiac Allograft Rejection | Cat II | Grade 1C | 2 days every 4 weeks |
| Lung Transplant Rejection (BOS) | Cat II | Grade 2C | 2 days every 2–4 weeks |
| Systemic Sclerosis | Cat III | Grade 2C | 2 days every 4 weeks |